mostly so what

1. 1

   Lisa on July 8, 2005 at 11:17 pm

   I’d say, this site wont come close to getting a “so what.”
   My 2 cents.

2. 2

   Joshua Kaufman on July 9, 2005 at 1:20 am

   I’m sure that many people were shrugging and saying so what when the first mouse appeared too. Its presentation doesn’t lend to its cause, but I appreciated the energy that was put into the site; it’s both informative and interactive. It may not have great implications for the immediate future but at least there’s someone out there questioning the standard and trying to innovate upon it. Who among us can say that we’re doing much more?

3. 3

   Matt on July 10, 2005 at 2:26 am

   joshua++

4. 4

   Cartoons-0f-Mine on July 13, 2005 at 7:21 am

   1st it said – server failed – really don’t click it 🙂

   2nd – after at least visited – “so what” is too much for such sites.

5. 5

   Jonathan on July 14, 2005 at 5:26 am

   I can see the motivation. After all, in real life people point at things they are interested in. The trouble is that in an interface like this there’s far too much going on when you transit from one area of the screen to another (the mouse-overs trigger off everything needlessly). Although that’s because they’ve eschewed any visual conventions for what’s actionable and what’s not, but even if they did it would become very tiring in serious use.

   I’m a great believer in two-stage stuff: one gesture to situate/pause/evaluate, then one to select what you want. Point AND click.

6. 6

   Frank Johnson on July 22, 2005 at 12:15 am

   good service

Comments are closed.